If you hang around our gyms long enough, you’ll hear some version of this debate in every locker room:
“If I want to lose fat, should I just do cardio?”
“But I heard lifting is better because it boosts your metabolism.”
“What if I do both—will they cancel each other out?”
A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis (36 randomized trials, 1,564 adults) just took a hard look at this exact question: comparing aerobic training (cardio), resistance training (strength), and concurrent training (both in the same week) and how each affects body fat, body weight, and muscle mass (PubMed). Here’s what it means for you at FITNESS SF.
They pulled together studies from 1980–2023 that:
They also looked at some “program-design” questions:
For programs lasting 10 weeks or longer:
Cardio (AT) and Concurrent Training (CT) both led to more absolute fat mass loss (in kg) than resistance training alone.
In plain language:
If the goal is pure fat loss on the scale, moving more (cardio) wins over just lifting.
However, percent body fat (how “lean” you are) wasn’t different between the three over the long term—your body composition improves with all of them.
Takeaway for members:
If you’re mostly lifting and barely getting your heart rate up between sets, you’re leaving easy fat-loss gains on the table. That doesn’t mean “ditch the weights”—it means add intentional cardio.
When the researchers looked at fat-free mass (FFM):
Resistance training (RT) did better than cardio alone at preserving (or increasing) muscle.
Concurrent training (CT) landed in the middle—not clearly better or worse than either, but it didn’t destroy gains.
So if your thought is:
“I want to lose body fat without becoming a smaller, weaker version of myself.”
…then resistance training is non-negotiable. Cardio can help the scale move, but weights help determine what you’re losing.
For programs shorter than 10 weeks:
There were no meaningful differences between cardio, lifting, or both for:
Fat mass
Body fat percentage
Body weight
Fat-free mass
Translation:
If you’re only looking at a 6–8 week window, the biggest win is simply:
Be consistent. Do something you’ll stick with.
Program “type” becomes more important as you extend into months, not weeks.
In a subset of studies where researchers tried to match workload between groups (similar duration or estimated caloric cost):
This reinforces something we tell members all the time:
Fat loss is primarily about total energy balance.
The exercise style still matters (for strength, enjoyment, joint health), but total volume and consistency drive most of the fat-loss outcome.
For concurrent training, they compared:
Cardio and lifting on the same day vs
Cardio and lifting on different days
Result:
Overall, no meaningful difference in fat loss, body weight, or muscle.
One analysis suggested same-day concurrent training might edge out pure lifting for fat mass, but this came from very limited data.
Good news:
You don’t need a perfect “cardio in the morning, lifting at night” schedule to make progress. Your life schedule and preferences matter more.
Let’s translate all this into real-world options.
Bias toward cardio, keep some lifting.
Concurrent training is your friend.
A simple structure:
You’ll likely:
Make lifting the base, sprinkle in enough movement.
This paper reinforces a message that doesn’t sound sexy, but works:
Anything is better than nothing—and you don’t have to choose a “team.” You can be Team Cardio + Strength + Consistency.
If you’re reading this and thinking:
“Okay, I get the theory… but what should I do with my schedule, my body, my injuries, my goals?”
That’s exactly where we come in.
At FITNESS SF, you can:
Next step: Stop by the front desk at your home club or talk to a FITNESS SF trainer on the floor to schedule your complimentary Fitness Assessment.
Let the science guide the strategy—and let us help you turn that strategy into progress you can actually feel in your clothes, on the stairs, and under the bar.